The place of intelligentsia in socio-economic development of society: the creative perspective
Abstract
In the context of the socio-economic approach to determining the place and role of the intelligentsia and its interaction with authorities, often only one point is reviewed, in which the intelligentsia is defined as the most progressive layer of society and at the same time oppressed by the authorities for progressive views. Thus, a search is needed between the desire of society for progress and the search for optimal conditions for coexistence between power and the intelligentsia. The novelty of the work is determined by the fact that the historical basis of the interaction between government and the intelligentsia should be considered not only in a historical perspective but also on the basis of an economic or anthropological approach. The authors of the article determine the role economic nature of the intelligentsia in the positive development of a socio-economic nature in society. The practical significance of the study is determined by the possibility of forming social development programs on the basis of philosophical discussions and determining the place and role of the intelligentsia in social development.
Keyword : development, intelligentsia, power, society, structure
How to Cite
Tabeikyna, E. K., Kamalova, G. T., Hasanov, E. L., Dzhumagaliyeva, K. V., & Demeuova, N. K. (2021). The place of intelligentsia in socio-economic development of society: the creative perspective. Creativity Studies, 14(1), 235-250. https://doi.org/10.3846/cs.2021.13639
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Abramov, R. (2016). Understanding professionalism in the Soviet Union and Post-Soviet Russia: an analytical review. The American Sociologist, 47, 81–101. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12108-015-9294-5
Andruschenko, V. P. (Ed.). (2005). Inteligenciya. In Filosofs’kyj slovnyk sociologichnyh terminiv (pp. 337–339). “R. I. F.”.
Anisimov, R. I. (2020). Vliyaniye tsifrovykh tekhnologiy na sotsial’nuyu strukturu obshchestva (posledstviya i problemy). https://grant.rscf.ru/file/pubs/file/00000000000000003152505_/file.pdf
Aristotle. (1994–2009). Politics. https://doi.org/10.1093/oseo/instance.00258611
Berdiaev, N. (2015). Philosophical verity and intelligentsia truth. In M. S. Shatz & J. E. Zimmerman (Eds.), Vekhi/Landmarks (pp. 1–16). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315287058
Berryman, J. (2019). A comparison of the German and Russian literary intelligentsia in Arnold Hauser’s social history of art. Studies in East European Thought, 71, 141–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-019-09327-4
Boborykin, P. D. (2003). Za polveka: vospominaniya. Zakharov.
Bryson, J. J. (2018). Patiency is not a virtue: the design of intelligent systems and systems of ethics. Ethics and Information Technology, 2, 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-018-9448-6
Bulgakov, S. P. (2005). Ot marksizma k idealizmu: stat’i i recenzii. Astrel.
Bulgakov, S. (2015). Heroism and asceticism: reflections on the religious nature of the Russian intelligentsia. In M. S. Shatz & J. E. Zimmerman (Eds.), Vekhi/Landmarks (pp. 17–50). Routledge.
Bychko, A., & Bychko, I. (1995). Ponyattya “intelihentsiya” u predmetnomu poli sotsial’noyi filosofiyi. Slovo i Chas, 9(10), 39–50.
Dmitriev, T. (2017). Max Weber and Peter Struve on the Russian revolution. Studies in East European Thought, 69, 305–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-017-9294-9
Dobruskin, M. (2005). Pro genezu termina ta filosofskogo ponyatiya “intelligentsiya”. Filosofskaya dumka, 5, 28–36.
Epstein, A., & Kheimets, N. (2000). Immigrant Intelligentsia and its second generation: cultural segregation as a road to social integration? Journal of International Migration and Integration, 1, 461–476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12134-000-1025-1
Fichte, J. G. (2012). The science of knowledge. Forgotten Books.
Frank, S. L. (1980). Etika nigilizma. Prideaux Press.
Frolov, I. T. (Ed.). (2001). Filosofskiy slovar’. Respublika.
Gaines, B. R. (1997). Knowledge management in societies of intelligent adaptive agents. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 9, 277–298. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008658220563
Glazov, Y. (1979). The Soviet intelligentsia, dissidents and the West. Studies in Soviet Thought, 19(4), 321–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00832020
Hegel, G. W. F. (2010). Science of logic. Series: The Cambridge Hegel Translations. Cambridge University Press.
Horujy, S. S. (2018). The ethical catastrophe of Contemporary Russia and its foresights in Russian thought. Studies in East European Thought, 70, 221–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-018-9311-7
Kal’noj, I. I. (2008). Esche raz o ponjatii “intelligencija”. Kul’tura narodov Prichernomorja, 134, 12–13.
Kennedy, D. (2014). The hermeneutic of suspicion in contemporary American legal thought. Law and Critique, 25, 91–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-014-9136-6
Kennedy, M. D. (1992). The intelligentsia in the constitution of civil societies and Post-Communist regimes in Hungary and Poland. Theory and Society, 21, 29–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00993462
Kijima, K. (2001). Why stratification of networks emerges in innovative society: intelligent poly-agent systems approach. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 7, 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011377532016
Kistyakovskij, B. A. (1991). V zashchite prava (intelligentsiya i pravosoznaniye). In Vekhi: sbornik gosudarstvennoy o russkoy intelligentsia (pp. 97–126). Molodaya gvardiya.
Kotchetkova, I. (2004). Dead or alive: the discursive massacre or the mass-suicide of Post-Soviet intelligentsia? Sociological Research Online, 9(4), 66–80. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.951
Likhachev, D. S. (1994). On the Russian intelligentsia. Russian Studies in Literature, 31(1), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.2753/RSL1061-1975310119
Loogma, K., Ümarik, M., Sirk, M., & Liivik, R. (2019). How history matters. The emergence and persistence of structural conflict between academic and vocational education: the case of Post-Soviet Estonia. Journal of Educational Change, 20, 105–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-018-09336-w
Losev, A. F. (1989). Ob intellektual’nosti. In A. F. Losev, Derzanie dukkha (pp. 314–322). Izdatel’stvo politicheskoy literatury.
Malyankar, R. M., & Findler, N. V. (1998). A methodology for modeling coordination in intelligent agent societies. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 4, 317–345. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009634413228
Milskaya, L. T. (Ed.). (1998). Kul’turologiya: XX vek. entsiklopediya. Aleteya.
Martin, D. (2014). Secularization: an international debate from a British perspective. Society, 51, 464–471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-014-9812-z
Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1981). Trudy. Tom 40. Izdatel’stvo politicheskoy literatury.
Miljukóv, P. N. (2013). Intelligentsiya i istoricheskaya traditsiya. http://russianway.rhga.ru/upload/main/88_Milyukov.pdf
Montaño Hirose, L. (1995). Organisational spaces and intelligent machines: a metaphorical approach to ethics. AI and Society: Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Communication, 9, 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01174478
Ossinsky, I. I. (Managing Ed.). (2012). Sovremennaya intelligentsiya: problemy sotsial’noy identifikatsii: sbornik nauchnykh trudov. Tom 1. Materialy IX Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii 18–21 iyunya 2012 g. Izdatel’stvo Buryatskogo gosuniversiteta.
Osipov, G. V. (Ed.). (2000). Sotsiologicheskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar’. Norma-Infra-M.
Ostrovsky, M. A. (2017). It is time to think “physiologically”. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 87, 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1019331617010105
Oushakine, S. A. (2009). Introduction. Wither the intelligentsia: the end of the moral elite in Eastern Europe. Studies in East European Thought, 61, 243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-009-9093-z
Saukh, P. (2018). Intelihentsiya: problema sotsial’noyi identyfikatsiyi, Lider. Elita. Suspil’stvo, 1, 46–59.
Schelling, F. W. J. (1997). System of Transcendental Idealism (1800). University Press of Virginia.
Shalin, D. N. (2017). Extended mind and embodied social psychology: contemporary perspectives. Society, 54, 279–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-017-0135-8
Shatz, M. S., & Zimmerman, J. E. (Eds.). (2015). Vekhi/Landmarks. Routledge.
Struve, P. B. (1980). Intelligentsiya i revolyutsiya. Series: Russian Titles for the Specialist. Vol. 223. Prideaux Press.
Uvarov, P. B. (2005). Deti khaosa: istoricheskiy fenomen intelligentsii. Seriya: AIRO–Monografiya. AIRO–XX.
Vinogradova, V. A. (2009). Intellectuals and intelligentsia in the pages of library periodicals. Scientific and Technical Information Processing, 36(4), 234–238. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147688209040078
Weber, M. (2015). Politics as vocation. In T. Waters & D. Waters (Eds.), Weber’s rationalism and modern society: new translations on politics, bureaucracy, and social stratification (pp. 135–136). Palgrave MacMillan.
Zysiak, A. (2019). Hysteresis, academic biography, and political field in the People’s Republic of Poland. Theory and Society, 48, 483–508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-019-09349-1
Andruschenko, V. P. (Ed.). (2005). Inteligenciya. In Filosofs’kyj slovnyk sociologichnyh terminiv (pp. 337–339). “R. I. F.”.
Anisimov, R. I. (2020). Vliyaniye tsifrovykh tekhnologiy na sotsial’nuyu strukturu obshchestva (posledstviya i problemy). https://grant.rscf.ru/file/pubs/file/00000000000000003152505_/file.pdf
Aristotle. (1994–2009). Politics. https://doi.org/10.1093/oseo/instance.00258611
Berdiaev, N. (2015). Philosophical verity and intelligentsia truth. In M. S. Shatz & J. E. Zimmerman (Eds.), Vekhi/Landmarks (pp. 1–16). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315287058
Berryman, J. (2019). A comparison of the German and Russian literary intelligentsia in Arnold Hauser’s social history of art. Studies in East European Thought, 71, 141–155. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-019-09327-4
Boborykin, P. D. (2003). Za polveka: vospominaniya. Zakharov.
Bryson, J. J. (2018). Patiency is not a virtue: the design of intelligent systems and systems of ethics. Ethics and Information Technology, 2, 15–26. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10676-018-9448-6
Bulgakov, S. P. (2005). Ot marksizma k idealizmu: stat’i i recenzii. Astrel.
Bulgakov, S. (2015). Heroism and asceticism: reflections on the religious nature of the Russian intelligentsia. In M. S. Shatz & J. E. Zimmerman (Eds.), Vekhi/Landmarks (pp. 17–50). Routledge.
Bychko, A., & Bychko, I. (1995). Ponyattya “intelihentsiya” u predmetnomu poli sotsial’noyi filosofiyi. Slovo i Chas, 9(10), 39–50.
Dmitriev, T. (2017). Max Weber and Peter Struve on the Russian revolution. Studies in East European Thought, 69, 305–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-017-9294-9
Dobruskin, M. (2005). Pro genezu termina ta filosofskogo ponyatiya “intelligentsiya”. Filosofskaya dumka, 5, 28–36.
Epstein, A., & Kheimets, N. (2000). Immigrant Intelligentsia and its second generation: cultural segregation as a road to social integration? Journal of International Migration and Integration, 1, 461–476. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12134-000-1025-1
Fichte, J. G. (2012). The science of knowledge. Forgotten Books.
Frank, S. L. (1980). Etika nigilizma. Prideaux Press.
Frolov, I. T. (Ed.). (2001). Filosofskiy slovar’. Respublika.
Gaines, B. R. (1997). Knowledge management in societies of intelligent adaptive agents. Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 9, 277–298. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008658220563
Glazov, Y. (1979). The Soviet intelligentsia, dissidents and the West. Studies in Soviet Thought, 19(4), 321–344. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00832020
Hegel, G. W. F. (2010). Science of logic. Series: The Cambridge Hegel Translations. Cambridge University Press.
Horujy, S. S. (2018). The ethical catastrophe of Contemporary Russia and its foresights in Russian thought. Studies in East European Thought, 70, 221–234. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-018-9311-7
Kal’noj, I. I. (2008). Esche raz o ponjatii “intelligencija”. Kul’tura narodov Prichernomorja, 134, 12–13.
Kennedy, D. (2014). The hermeneutic of suspicion in contemporary American legal thought. Law and Critique, 25, 91–139. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10978-014-9136-6
Kennedy, M. D. (1992). The intelligentsia in the constitution of civil societies and Post-Communist regimes in Hungary and Poland. Theory and Society, 21, 29–76. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00993462
Kijima, K. (2001). Why stratification of networks emerges in innovative society: intelligent poly-agent systems approach. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 7, 45–62. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1011377532016
Kistyakovskij, B. A. (1991). V zashchite prava (intelligentsiya i pravosoznaniye). In Vekhi: sbornik gosudarstvennoy o russkoy intelligentsia (pp. 97–126). Molodaya gvardiya.
Kotchetkova, I. (2004). Dead or alive: the discursive massacre or the mass-suicide of Post-Soviet intelligentsia? Sociological Research Online, 9(4), 66–80. https://doi.org/10.5153/sro.951
Likhachev, D. S. (1994). On the Russian intelligentsia. Russian Studies in Literature, 31(1), 19–31. https://doi.org/10.2753/RSL1061-1975310119
Loogma, K., Ümarik, M., Sirk, M., & Liivik, R. (2019). How history matters. The emergence and persistence of structural conflict between academic and vocational education: the case of Post-Soviet Estonia. Journal of Educational Change, 20, 105–135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-018-09336-w
Losev, A. F. (1989). Ob intellektual’nosti. In A. F. Losev, Derzanie dukkha (pp. 314–322). Izdatel’stvo politicheskoy literatury.
Malyankar, R. M., & Findler, N. V. (1998). A methodology for modeling coordination in intelligent agent societies. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 4, 317–345. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1009634413228
Milskaya, L. T. (Ed.). (1998). Kul’turologiya: XX vek. entsiklopediya. Aleteya.
Martin, D. (2014). Secularization: an international debate from a British perspective. Society, 51, 464–471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-014-9812-z
Marx, K., & Engels, F. (1981). Trudy. Tom 40. Izdatel’stvo politicheskoy literatury.
Miljukóv, P. N. (2013). Intelligentsiya i istoricheskaya traditsiya. http://russianway.rhga.ru/upload/main/88_Milyukov.pdf
Montaño Hirose, L. (1995). Organisational spaces and intelligent machines: a metaphorical approach to ethics. AI and Society: Journal of Knowledge, Culture and Communication, 9, 43–56. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01174478
Ossinsky, I. I. (Managing Ed.). (2012). Sovremennaya intelligentsiya: problemy sotsial’noy identifikatsii: sbornik nauchnykh trudov. Tom 1. Materialy IX Mezhdunarodnoy nauchnoy konferentsii 18–21 iyunya 2012 g. Izdatel’stvo Buryatskogo gosuniversiteta.
Osipov, G. V. (Ed.). (2000). Sotsiologicheskiy entsiklopedicheskiy slovar’. Norma-Infra-M.
Ostrovsky, M. A. (2017). It is time to think “physiologically”. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 87, 93–99. https://doi.org/10.1134/S1019331617010105
Oushakine, S. A. (2009). Introduction. Wither the intelligentsia: the end of the moral elite in Eastern Europe. Studies in East European Thought, 61, 243. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11212-009-9093-z
Saukh, P. (2018). Intelihentsiya: problema sotsial’noyi identyfikatsiyi, Lider. Elita. Suspil’stvo, 1, 46–59.
Schelling, F. W. J. (1997). System of Transcendental Idealism (1800). University Press of Virginia.
Shalin, D. N. (2017). Extended mind and embodied social psychology: contemporary perspectives. Society, 54, 279–290. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12115-017-0135-8
Shatz, M. S., & Zimmerman, J. E. (Eds.). (2015). Vekhi/Landmarks. Routledge.
Struve, P. B. (1980). Intelligentsiya i revolyutsiya. Series: Russian Titles for the Specialist. Vol. 223. Prideaux Press.
Uvarov, P. B. (2005). Deti khaosa: istoricheskiy fenomen intelligentsii. Seriya: AIRO–Monografiya. AIRO–XX.
Vinogradova, V. A. (2009). Intellectuals and intelligentsia in the pages of library periodicals. Scientific and Technical Information Processing, 36(4), 234–238. https://doi.org/10.3103/S0147688209040078
Weber, M. (2015). Politics as vocation. In T. Waters & D. Waters (Eds.), Weber’s rationalism and modern society: new translations on politics, bureaucracy, and social stratification (pp. 135–136). Palgrave MacMillan.
Zysiak, A. (2019). Hysteresis, academic biography, and political field in the People’s Republic of Poland. Theory and Society, 48, 483–508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11186-019-09349-1